Kirk-Johnson's perseived effort as poor learning
Table of Contents
Summary of the Paper
"Perceived Effort as Poor Learning: The Misinterpreted-Effort Hypothesis of How Experienced Effort and Perceived Learning Relate to Study Strategy Choice" by Afton Kirk-Johnson and Others
Introduction
The paper by Afton Kirk-Johnson and colleagues investigates the relationship between experienced effort in learning activities and perceived learning outcomes. The central theme is the "misinterpreted-effort hypothesis," which posits that
individuals often misinterpret the effort they exert during learning as an indication of poor learning performance, leading to suboptimal study strategy choices.
Key Hypothesis
The "misinterpreted-effort hypothesis" suggests that learners may mistakenly equate higher effort with lower levels of learning due to discomfort or cognitive strain, thereby influencing their selection of learning strategies.
Objectives
- To explore the relationship between perceived effort and perceived learning.
- To examine how this relationship affects the choice of study strategies.
- To understand the cognitive mechanisms that underlie the misinterpretation of learning effort.
Methodology
The study employed experimental designs involving various learning tasks. Participants were asked to engage in study activities and report their perceived effort and perceived learning. The research measured the impact of these perceptions on subsequent choices of study strategies, such as rereading versus practice testing.
Findings
Effort and Learning Perception
- Participants often perceived higher effort as indicative of poorer learning, even when this was not the case.
- The relationship between effort and perceived learning was influenced by task difficulty and familiarity.
Study Strategy Choice
- As a result of misinterpreting effort, participants were more likely to choose easier, less effective study strategies (e.g., rereading) over more challenging, effective ones (e.g., practice testing).
- This misinterpretation was found to lead to less effective learning outcomes in the long term.
Cognitive Mechanisms
- The study suggested that cognitive strain and discomfort during challenging tasks may be misinterpreted as failure, affecting motivation and strategy selection.
- It highlighted the need to educate learners about the nature of productive struggle and effortful learning to correct these misconceptions.
The Marrow
The research underscores the importance of understanding the subjective experience of effort in learning contexts. Addressing the misinterpreted-effort hypothesis can lead to more effective learning behaviors and improved educational outcomes, by helping learners differentiate between effort and effective learning.
The Essence
Effort Misinterpretation
- Learners often misinterpret high levels of effort as signs of ineffective learning or poor performance, despite effort frequently correlating with deeper cognitive processing and better long-term retention.
Impact on Study Strategy Choice
- Misinterpreted effort leads learners to opt for easier, less effective study strategies such as rereading, rather than engaging in more effortful but beneficial practices like practice testing.
Perception vs. Reality
- There is a disconnect between perceived effort and actual learning outcomes, resulting from cognitive discomfort being mistaken for failure.
Educational Interventions
- Both educators and learners can benefit from being educated about the productive nature of cognitive effort and how it contributes to effective learning.
Strategy Awareness
- Increasing awareness of evidence-based study strategies can help overcome misconceptions and promote more effective learning behaviors.
Implications
Educational Practice
Educators should emphasize that effort and cognitive strain are not inherently negative and often correlate with deeper learning.
Learner Awareness
Training learners to recognize the value of effortful processing and encouraging the use of evidence-based study strategies.
Study Strategy Design
Development of interventions to help learners make better-informed decisions about their study strategies based on actual performance rather than perceived effort.
Key Takeaway
Recognizing and addressing the misconceptions around learning effort and strategy choice can significantly enhance the effectiveness of learning processes and outcomes.
Reference
Kirk-Johnson, A., et al. (Year).
Perceived Effort as Poor Learning: The Misinterpreted-Effort Hypothesis of How Experienced Effort and Perceived Learning Relate to Study Strategy Choice.
Cognitive Psychology